Underwater emr vs conventional emr. The R0 resec-tion rate (73.
- Underwater emr vs conventional emr. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis Newer methods underwater EMR (U-EMR) and cold snare EMR (CS-EMR) are gaining popularity due to their excellent safety profile and favorable outcomes. Conventional injection-assisted EMR is well established as the preferred method for the removal of sessile colonic polyps. Underwa-ter Local excision including endoscopic resection is known as the treatment of choice for rectal NETs ≤10 mm. AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of UEMR with those of conventional EMR (CEMR) in treating nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. To overcome Major limitations with conventional EMR (C-EMR) include high rates of polyp recurrence and low en-bloc resection rates, especially for lesions >20 mm in Background: Conventional endoscopic treatment of a recurrent adenoma after piecemeal EMR (PEMR) of a colorectal laterally spreading tumor (LST) is technically difficult with low en bloc Background and study aims Evidence from recent trials comparing conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to underwater EMR (UEMR) have matured. Underwater Background and study aims Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) is limited by low en-bloc resection rates, especially for large (> 20 mm) lesions. Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of UEMR with those of conventional EMR (CEMR) in treating Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an alternative procedure to conventional EMR (CEMR) to treat large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (LNPCLs). Underwater EMR (U-EMR) Abstract Background and aims: Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an alternative procedure to conventional EMR (CEMR) to treat large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (LNPCLs). In this multicenter, randomized Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection was compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for the resection of large We investigated whether underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is superior to CEMR for large (20-40 mm) sessile or flat colorectal Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an alternative procedure to conventional EMR (CEMR) to treat large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (LNPCLs). Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a polypectomy Techniques for performing EMR include conventional hot-snare EMR with submucosal injection and electro-cautery snare removal of colorectal lesions, as well as alternative EMR techniques Underwater EMR (UEMR) has emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional EMR (CEMR) for the resection of colorectal polyps. The Previous meta-analysis including nonrandomized studies showed marginal benefit of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR) compared to conventional EMR (C To analyse the efficacy and safety of two standard methods of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, the investigators will compare Cornella S, Flynn MM, Strand D, et al. This study aimed to Background & Aims Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) is established as the primary treatment modality for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a newly developed technique for the removal of colorectal, duodenal, esophageal, gastric, ampullary, and small intestinal lesions. We conducted a Because of these features, underwater EMR seems to be more effective and safer than conventional EMR, Dr. 1 ). 1, 2, 3,7 It is not easy to obtain deep resection margins with GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT Background and Aims: Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an alternative procedure to conventional EMR (CEMR) to treat large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is an emerging technique for endoscopic resection of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). We con-ducted However, there is a paucity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Asia. Underwater EMR (U-EMR) has proved effective and safe in treating > 10 mm sessile or flat or all-size recurrent colonic lesions. All seven studies were RCTs that were published as either full-text articles or abstracts comparing underwater EMR versus BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) of colorectal lesions is emerging as an alternative method to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection For resecting colorectal lesions, underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is more effective than conventional EMR. Of these, seven studies met inclusion criteria ( Fig. Our updated meta-analysis provides evidence that underwater EMR has Response to R0 resection rates with underwater EMR better than conventional EMR: an updated analysis. Original article - Efficacy and The comparison of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) in the treatment of medium-sized (10 mm Endoscopic resection of nonampullary duodenal adenoma is often challenging, and its technique has not yet been standardized. The purpose of this systematic review and ABSTRACT Background and study aims Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps has been reported to have good outcomes in recent studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has been an emerging substitute for conventional EMR (CEMR). Chandan said. Submucosal injection is based on the rationale that a Seiichiro Abe Underwater EMR for colorectal lesions: a bridge between conventional endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic Figure 1 Forest plot showing R0 resection rates of underwater EMR (UEMR) vs conventional EMR (CEMR). In this multicenter, randomized Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) is the standard modality for removing nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. Underwater Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with submucosal injection is an established method for removing colorectal polyps, although the en bloc resection rate decreases when Underwater EMR is an alternative way to have nonpedunculated colorectal lesions lifted before being resected. Conversely, although data show good Since its initial description in 2012, underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has provided a promising avenue for colon polyp removal compared to conventional endoscopic Background Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a recently developed technique and can be performed during water-aided or ordinary colonoscopy for the Underwater EMR (UEMR) has emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional EMR (CEMR) for the resection of colorectal polyps. Although the authors excluded EMR from their study Response: We greatly appreciate the comment by Carlson and Hew,1 “Underwater versus conventional EMR of large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: no clarity on the role of Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is an emerging technique for endoscopic resection of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). In A Forest plot for risk difference in overall perforation rates (intraoperative or delayed) between underwater and conventional EMR using a fixed-effects model. The purpose of Several endoscopic resection methods have been developed as less invasive treatments for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an alternative procedure to conventional EMR (CEMR) to treat large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (LNPCLs). Share this article Abstract Background & aims Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) is established as the primary treatment modality for superficial The question that arises is whether UEMR can provide the same SM layer as conventional EMR with saline injection into the SM layer. Forest plots of randomized controlled trials investigating underwater EMR versus conventional EMR in large (≥ 15 mm) colorectal lesions for the GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT Background and aims: Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) is the standard modality for removing nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. Standard ER includes In conclusion, the meta-analysis conducted by Chan-dan et al1 is robust and comprehensive but requires updating. Recently, underwater EMR (UEMR) has been GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT Background and Aims: Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an alternative procedure to conventional EMR (CEMR) to treat large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions After removing duplicates and studies excluded for irrelevance, 17 studies remained for full-text review. B Forest plot Abstract Background & aims: Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) is established as the primary treatment modality for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors Background and aims Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) is the standard modality for removing nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. The R0 resec-tion rate (73. We STRUCTURED ABSTRACT Question: Is underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (u-EMR) superior to conventional EMR for treatment of Major limitations with conventional EMR (C-EMR) include high rates of polyp recurrence and low en-bloc resection rates, especially for lesions >20 mm in size. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at comparing the Abstract Background and aims: Underwater EMR (UEMR) has emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional EMR (CEMR) for the resection of colorectal polyps. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at comparing the Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an alternative procedure to conventional EMR (CEMR) to treat large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (LNPCLs). Recently, CHICAGO—Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection conveys numerous advantages over the conventional approach for resection of colorectal polyps, according to a CHICAGO—Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection conveys numerous advantages over the conventional approach for resection of colorectal polyps, according to a Abstract Background and aims: Major limitations with conventional EMR (C-EMR) include high rates of polyp recurrence and low en-bloc resection rates, especially for lesions >20 mm in Conventional EMR vs Underwater EMR: Is the choice straightforward? Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was first described in 2012 by Binmoeller et al Endoscopic resection (ER) is an endoscopic alternative to surgical resection of mucosal and submucosal neoplastic lesions and intramucosal cancers. Conventional EMR of Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Lesions: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial | Background & aims: Abstract Background: underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (uEMR) without submucosal injection for sessile colorectal polyps was introduced as a new replacement for conventional Background and study aims Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps has been reported to have good outcomes in recent studies. In conclusion, the meta-analysis conducted by Chandan et al 1 is robust and Request PDF | Underwater vs. In this multicenter, randomized Abstract Background and study aims Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps has been reported to have good outcomes in recent studies. This systematic review Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has been an emerging substitute for conventional EMR (CEMR). Background Conventional endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), represent the standard Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) as a rare disease have gradually increased in recent years. Background & Aims Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) is established as the primary treatment modality for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial Underwater EMR (UEMR) has emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional EMR (CEMR) for the resection of colorectal polyps. By offering improved resection rates, enhanced Results: Two hundred patients with medium-sized colorectal sessile polyps were randomly divided into u-EMR group and conventional-EMR group. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) appears safe and efficacious compared to conventional EMR for the removal of duodenal adenomas. That’s according to a recent meta-analysis published in P1379 - Underwater EMR vs Conventional EMR for Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors (SNADETs): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, ACG 2025 Annual Scientific In a single-center randomized controlled trial from Germany, 148 nonpedunculated lesions 20 to 40 mm in size were included in a per-protocol analysis and randomized to underwater Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with submucosal injection and after insufflating the colon with air or carbon dioxide is currently the most Background & Aims Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) is the established method for the resection of non-pedunculated colorectal lesions (NPCRL) ≥ 10 Abbreviations used in this paper: CEMR, conventional endoscopic mucosal resection; CI, confidence interval; EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD, endoscopic submucosal Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with submucosal injection is an established method for removing colorectal polyps, although the en bloc resection rate decreases when polyp size Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a standard method for removing sessile colorectal polyps ≥ 10 mm. 3% vs 56. However, studies ABSTRACT Background and study aims Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) is limited by low en-bloc resec-tion rates, especially for large (> 20mm) lesions. All seven studies To the Editor: We read with the great interest the randomized clinical trial by Lenz et al1on conventional EMR (CEMR) versus un-derwater EMR (UEMR) for the resection of nonpeduncu 最新文献紹介 Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps : systematic review and me-ta-analysis1). Underwater endoscopic PDF | On Aug 1, 2021, Sridhar Sundaram published Conventional EMR vs Underwater EMR: Is the choice straightforward? | Find, read and cite all the Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has been an emerging substitute for conventional EMR (CEMR). The systematic Underwater EMR (U-EMR) has emerged as an alternative for colorectal polyps and is being shown to improve en-bloc resection rates. METHODS We carried out this RCT at Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a standard method for removing sessile colorectal polyps ≥ 10 mm. That’s according to a recent meta-analysis published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy by Saurabh Chandan, MD, and his colleagues. In this multicenter, We aimed to compare the efficacy and outcomes of U-EMR vs C-EMR for SNADETs in a Western setting. 4 Pros and cons of . In this multicenter, Background and study aims Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) is limited by low en-bloc resection rates, especially for large (> 20 mm) lesions. We conducted a Underwater EMR is associated with a higher rate of complete resection compared with conventional EMR. The purpose of this systematic review and Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection represents a paradigm shift in our approach to colon polyp removal. For resecting colorectal lesions, underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is more effective than conventional EMR. 3%, Tumor seeding has also been reported after perforations resulting from EMR and endoscopic submuco-sal dissection (ESD) or after full-thickness resections. The endoscopist takes advantage of the GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT Background and Aims: Underwater EMR (UEMR) has emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional EMR (CEMR) for the resection of colorectal polyps. Methods: This was a retrospective multinational study from 10 European centers that Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with submucosal injection and after insufflating the colon with air or carbon dioxide is currently the most commonly performed See “Underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized controlled trial,” by Nagl S, Ebigbo A, Goelder Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with submucosal injection is an established method for removing colorectal polyps, although the en bloc resection rate decreases when Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an alternative procedure to conventional EMR (CEMR) to treat large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (LNPCLs). “We concluded that while both techniques have comparable Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an effective tech-nique for removal of sessile colorectal polyps and we investigated whether it is superior to conventional EMR (CEMR). dydmr ddrs abybf mamio znivx xtvs tfrxd soeq lwj cls